EduKG
← Back

Half-life and radiation protection principles

Learning objectives

  • Outcome

    Calculate the remaining fraction of nuclei with N=N02−nN=N_0 2^{-n} for a whole number of half-lives and with N=N0e−λtN=N_0 e^{-\lambda t} for an arbitrary time.

  • Outcome

    Convert a half-life into a decay constant and calculate activity A=λNA=\lambda N, expressing the result in becquerels.

  • Outcome

    Estimate how dose rate changes with distance via the inverse-square law and with shielding via I=I02−x/d1/2I=I_0 2^{-x/d_{1/2}}.

  • Outcome

    Apply momentum conservation to calculate the alpha-particle energy and the recoil-nucleus energy for a given decay energy QQ.

Understand the idea

Text

Atomic nuclei of the same element with different numbers of neutrons are isotopes; some of them are unstable and decay spontaneously, emitting alpha or beta particles and gamma rays.

Decay of an individual nucleus is a random event, but for a macroscopic sample the number of decays per second is proportional to the number of nuclei:

dNdt=−λN,N(t)=N0e−λt.\frac{dN}{dt}=-\lambda N,\qquad N(t)=N_0 e^{-\lambda t}.

The half-life T1/2T_{1/2} is the time after which exactly half of the nuclei remain:

T1/2=ln⁡2λ,N(t)=N02−t/T1/2.T_{1/2}=\frac{\ln 2}{\lambda},\qquad N(t)=N_0 2^{-t/T_{1/2}}.

Activity A=λNA=\lambda N is measured in becquerels (Bq), while biological effects are described by absorbed dose in grays (Gy = J/kg) and effective dose in sieverts (Sv).

Radiation protection rests on three levers — time, distance, and shielding:

I(r)=I0r02r2,I(x)=I0e−μx,I(r)=\frac{I_0 r_0^2}{r^2},\qquad I(x)=I_0 e^{-\mu x},

and the ALARA principle requires keeping the dose as low as reasonably achievable.

In alpha decay, momentum conservation (the same idea as in collisions) splits the energy QQ between the alpha particle and the recoil nucleus in inverse proportion to their masses:

Eα=QM2M2+mα,E_\alpha=Q\frac{M_2}{M_2+m_\alpha},

where M2M_2 is the daughter-nucleus mass.

Worked examples

Direct

Problem

A sample contains N0=6.0×1020N_0=6.0\times10^{20} nuclei of an isotope with half-life T1/2=8.0 dT_{1/2}=8.0\ \mathrm{d}. How many nuclei remain after 24 days, and what is the decay constant λ\lambda?

Solution

Given: N0=6.0×1020N_0=6.0\times10^{20}, T1/2=8.0 dT_{1/2}=8.0\ \mathrm{d}, t=24 dt=24\ \mathrm{d}.

  1. Number of half-lives: n=t/T1/2=24/8.0=3n=t/T_{1/2}=24/8.0=3.
  2. Remaining nuclei: N=N02−n=6.0×1020⋅2−3=7.5×1019N=N_0 2^{-n}=6.0\times10^{20}\cdot 2^{-3}=7.5\times10^{19} nuclei.
  3. Decay constant: λ=ln⁡2/T1/2=0.693/(8.0 d)=0.0866 d−1=1.0×10−6 s−1\lambda=\ln 2/T_{1/2}=0.693/(8.0\ \mathrm{d})=0.0866\ \mathrm{d^{-1}}=1.0\times10^{-6}\ \mathrm{s^{-1}} (here d\mathrm{d} means days).

Application

Problem

A point gamma source produces an equivalent dose rate of 40 μSv/h40\ \mathrm{\mu Sv/h} at a distance of 2.0 m2.0\ \mathrm{m}.

(a) What is the dose rate at 5.0 m5.0\ \mathrm{m}?

(b) How many layers of lead with half-value layer d1/2=1.2 cmd_{1/2}=1.2\ \mathrm{cm} are needed to reduce the dose rate below 1.0 μSv/h1.0\ \mathrm{\mu Sv/h}?

Solution

(a) Inverse-square law:

I(5.0)=I(2.0)(2.05.0)2=40⋅0.16=6.4 μSv/h.I(5.0)=I(2.0)\left(\frac{2.0}{5.0}\right)^2=40\cdot 0.16=6.4\ \mathrm{\mu Sv/h}.

(b) Shielding:

6.4⋅2−n<1.0 ⇒ 2n>6.4 ⇒ n>ln⁡6.4ln⁡2=2.68.6.4\cdot 2^{-n}<1.0\ \Rightarrow\ 2^{n}>6.4\ \Rightarrow\ n>\frac{\ln 6.4}{\ln 2}=2.68.

Take n=3n=3 layers, that is x=3⋅1.2 cm=3.6 cmx=3\cdot 1.2\ \mathrm{cm}=3.6\ \mathrm{cm} of lead. Check: 6.4/23=0.8 μSv/h<1.0 μSv/h6.4/2^3=0.8\ \mathrm{\mu Sv/h}<1.0\ \mathrm{\mu Sv/h}.

Transfer

Problem

A 226Ra^{226}\mathrm{Ra} nucleus undergoes alpha decay: 226Ra→222Rn+α^{226}\mathrm{Ra}\to{}^{222}\mathrm{Rn}+\alpha with total decay energy Q=4.87 MeVQ=4.87\ \mathrm{MeV}. Assuming the parent 226Ra^{226}\mathrm{Ra} nucleus is at rest before the decay, find the kinetic energies of the alpha particle and the recoil nucleus. Explain why this alpha emitter is dangerous when inhaled but easily shielded from outside.

Solution

Momenta: the initial momentum is zero, so pα=p2=pp_\alpha=p_2=p in magnitude, with opposite directions.

Energies: since E=p2/(2m)E=p^2/(2m), the energy ratio is the inverse mass ratio:

EαE2=M2mα=2224.\frac{E_\alpha}{E_2}=\frac{M_2}{m_\alpha}=\frac{222}{4}.

Splitting QQ: Eα+E2=QE_\alpha+E_2=Q, hence

Eα=QM2M2+mα=4.87⋅222226=4.78 MeV,E_\alpha=Q\frac{M_2}{M_2+m_\alpha}=4.87\cdot\frac{222}{226}=4.78\ \mathrm{MeV},

E2=Q−Eα=4.87−4.78=0.09 MeV.E_2=Q-E_\alpha=4.87-4.78=0.09\ \mathrm{MeV}.

Protection conclusion: an alpha particle of about 4.8 MeV4.8\ \mathrm{MeV} has a range of only a few centimetres in air and is stopped by the dead layer of skin, so external exposure is nearly harmless. But if an aerosol containing 226Ra^{226}\mathrm{Ra} is inhaled, all that energy is deposited in a small volume of lung tissue, giving a large local dose; the main measure is therefore containment, ventilation, and aerosol monitoring, not heavy shielding.

Practice

Text

Safe self-study: do not use real radioactive sources.

  1. Open the PhET simulation “Alpha Decay” (or a similar radioactive-decay model) and start it with a large number of nuclei (for example, 100).
  2. Record the number of undecayed nuclei NN at equal time intervals until roughly a quarter of the initial amount remains.
  3. Plot ln⁡N\ln N against time: the points should form a straight line with slope −λ-\lambda; find T1/2=ln⁡2/λT_{1/2}=\ln 2/\lambda and compare it with the value shown by the simulation.
  4. In the same simulation, place different materials (paper, aluminium, lead) and different thicknesses between the source and the detector, then double the distance. Record what reduces the count rate more strongly — distance or shielding.
  5. State three practical ALARA rules for an imaginary laboratory: less time near the source, greater distance, and the right shield.

Visual reference

Purpose

Show that exponential decay becomes a straight line on a semi-log plot, and that the dose rate from a point source falls as 1/r21/r^2 while a shield attenuates it in halving steps.

Representation

Two-panel diagram.

  • Panel (a): a graph with ln⁡N\ln N vertical and time tt horizontal; a straight line with slope −λ-\lambda; the time axis marks T1/2T_{1/2}, 2T1/22T_{1/2}, 3T1/23T_{1/2}, and the ln⁡N\ln N axis marks ln⁡N0\ln N_0, ln⁡N0−ln⁡2\ln N_0-\ln 2, and so on.
  • Panel (b): a sketch of a point source at the centre, two circles of radii rr and 2r2r with the same number of rays passing through them; beside it, bars for dose rates II and I/4I/4, and on the right a shield plate labelled d1/2d_{1/2} with decreasing arrows I→I/2→I/4I\to I/2\to I/4.

Real-world examples

A banana and potassium-40: radioactivity in food

Scenario

A banana contains about 450 mg of potassium. The fraction of the radioactive isotope 40K^{40}\text{K} in natural potassium is 0.0117 %, and its half-life is T1/2=1.25×109T_{1/2}=1.25\times 10^9 years. The activity of such a banana is about 15 Bq, that is, 15 decays per second. Eating one banana gives a person an effective dose of about 0.1 µSv, whereas the natural background gives about 2.4 mSv per year. Because potassium in the body is regulated, the activity of 40K^{40}\text{K} in the body does not fall with time according to this half-life.

Connection

Here the relation between activity and the number of nuclei is used: A=λNA=\lambda N, where λ=ln⁡2T1/2\lambda=\frac{\ln 2}{T_{1/2}}. The huge half-life 1.25×1091.25\times 10^9 years gives a tiny decay constant λ≈1.76×10−17 s−1\lambda\approx 1.76\times 10^{-17}\ \text{s}^{-1}, so over a human lifetime the number of nuclei NN is practically unchanged. The dose of 0.1 µSv is compared with the annual background of 2.4 mSv, which demonstrates the principle of estimating radiation hazard through dose.

Radon in a basement: half-life and protection by ventilation

Scenario

In a basement with a volume of 60 m360\ \text{m}^3, the volumetric activity of radon 222Rn^{222}\text{Rn} is 200 Bq/m3200\ \text{Bq/m}^3. The total activity of radon in the basement is A=200 Bq/m3×60 m3=12 000 BqA=200\ \text{Bq/m}^3\times 60\ \text{m}^3=12\,000\ \text{Bq}. The half-life of radon is T1/2=3.82T_{1/2}=3.82 days. If the basement is closed, after 3.82 days half of the radon nuclei remain, but radon continuously enters from the soil. Opening a window for 30 minutes can reduce the concentration several times due to ventilation, not only due to decay.

Connection

The half-life sets the rate at which the number of nuclei decreases: N(t)=N02−t/T1/2N(t)=N_0 2^{-t/T_{1/2}}. At t=3.82t=3.82 days, N=N0/2N=N_0/2. However, in a real room the decrease of radon is also determined by ventilation: the protection principle “time — distance — shielding” is applied here as reducing the time spent and removing the source (ventilation). The short half-life of radon means that it quickly turns into daughter isotopes (for example, 218Po^{218}\text{Po}), which give the main dose upon inhalation.

Radiography of a bridge weld: iridium-192, distance and protection

Scenario

To inspect a bridge weld, a source of 192Ir^{192}\text{Ir} with an initial activity A0=3.7 TBqA_0=3.7\ \text{TBq} (100 Ci100\ \text{Ci}) is used. Its half-life is T1/2=73.8T_{1/2}=73.8 days. After 74 days the activity becomes A=1.85 TBqA=1.85\ \text{TBq}, so the exposure time for the same image density must be doubled. At a distance r=1r=1 m the dose rate from the source is about 10 mSv/h10\ \text{mSv/h}; at a distance r=20r=20 m it drops by a factor of 202=40020^2=400 and becomes 25 µSv/h25\ \text{µSv/h}. In 8 minutes at such a distance the dose will be about 25 µSv/h×860 h≈3.3 µSv25\ \text{µSv/h}\times \frac{8}{60}\ \text{h}\approx 3.3\ \text{µSv}. The half-value layer of lead for the gamma radiation of 192Ir^{192}\text{Ir} is about 12 mm.

Connection

The half-life determines the activity at any moment: A(t)=A02−t/T1/2A(t)=A_0 2^{-t/T_{1/2}}. At t=74t=74 days, t/T1/2≈1.00t/T_{1/2}\approx 1.00, hence A≈A0/2A\approx A_0/2. Protection is based on three principles: time (reduce exposure), distance (inverse-square law I∝1/r2I\propto 1/r^2), and shielding (half-value layer). The calculation 10/202=0.025 mSv/h=25 µSv/h10/20^2=0.025\ \text{mSv/h}=25\ \text{µSv/h} shows how distance replaces a heavy lead shield.